<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>args.ai blog</title><description>Notes on AI document workflows that produce verifiable work product.</description><link>https://www.args.ai/</link><atom:link href="https://www.args.ai/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI that asks instead of guessing</title><link>https://www.args.ai/blog/ai-that-asks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.args.ai/blog/ai-that-asks/</guid><description>When our workflow is missing a cited reference or cannot place a document, it stops and asks. In legal work, a confident guess is worse than a question.</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>&quot;Documents Considered&quot;: provenance as a feature</title><link>https://www.args.ai/blog/documents-considered/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.args.ai/blog/documents-considered/</guid><description>Every report ends with a table of what the workflow read — and an honest marker on anything relied on but never reviewed.</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Verbatim claim language is a property you enforce, not a prompt you hope survives</title><link>https://www.args.ai/blog/verbatim-by-construction/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.args.ai/blog/verbatim-by-construction/</guid><description>Why our rejection charts run every row through a deterministic fidelity check — and why &quot;please quote exactly&quot; is not a quality strategy for legal AI.</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>